Tuesday, April 29, 2025

The Falling Man

The illustration on the cover of Weird Tales for April 1925 is for "When the Green Star Waned" by Nictzin Dyalhis. The artist was Andrew Brosnatch. It shows a man who appears to be falling into a mass of aliens that have invaded Earth. In actuality, the aliens have levitated him the way a Roman might hold a grape over his open mouth. The intent is the same: the aliens mean to eat him. In a moment, they will let go with their powers of levitation and he will plunge into their mass, where they await with their "triangular, gaping, hideous orifices." The man is spared his fate by the merciful actions of the Venus-Men.

Andrew Brosnatch's cover illustration makes me think of Christian art, especially depictions of Hell and the casting into Hell of sinners. His garb is also redolent of ancient or biblical dress. First is Brosnatch's cover, then an example of the falling man from Christian art:


"Casting the Damned into Hell," the right wing of a triptych entitled The Last Judgment, by German-Flemish artist Hans Memling (ca. 1430-1494). See in particular the figure on the middle right.

There are many more examples of the falling man, cast into Hell, in Christian art. If you go looking for such imagery, be ready for some nightmarish, yet fascinating, depictions of Hell, some of which remind me of William Hope Hodgson's description of our nightmarish future in The Night Land (1912).

Depictions of Icarus by European artists show a similar falling man from pre-Christian and pagan times. The image of the falling spaceman is common in science fiction art, the art of the future. (I guess apocalyptic art is art of the future, too.) Here's an example of that:

The Fallen Spaceman by Lee Harding (1973), with art by John and Ian Schoenherr. Be aware that I have adjusted this image from an online photograph of the cover. This is not a true representation of the original.

I don't know whether Andrew Brosnatch intended to evoke thoughts of the fall of man from the Book of Genesis, of the sinner and the damned cast into Hell, or of the general image of man falling from grace or from great heights into opposing depths. Those of us with religious upbringing and education can't avoid seeing such things, though.

I have just one more thing. My nephew and I noticed a long time ago that all of the major characters in Star Wars sooner or later fall into a pit. The same thing happens to Indiana Jones and Marion Ravenwood, also to characters in The Lord of the Rings saga. That fear, dread, and terror at falling or plunging, or being cast into pits and depths, must be deep in us, no pun intended, and always ready to come forth. 

Text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Sunday, April 27, 2025

April Aliens & April Invasions

The cover story and lead story in the April 1925 issue of Weird Tales is "When the Green Star Waned" by Nictzin Dyalhis. The "Green Star" of the title is Earth as seen from the planet Venus. The men of Venus have noticed that the green light of Earth has faded and that their neighboring planet has gone silent. These two developments have raised the alarm on Venus. The great men of that planet decide to travel to Earth to find out what has happened. (1, 2)

"When the Green Star Waned" is about an alien invasion of Earth. The aliens of the story have enslaved Earthmen and it is we who prove weak, helpless, and powerless to save ourselves. The heroes and rescuers in "When the Green Star Waned" are in fact Venus-Men rather than Earthmen. That alone makes for an unusual story. There are other ways in which "When the Green Star Waned" is unusual or innovative.

Nictzin Dyalhis' story is an early example of weird fantasy, science fantasy, space fantasy, or the weird-science type of story. Later science fiction would treat the same kind of situation--going up against alien invaders of other planets--except that it is Earthmen who are the heroes and rescuers. It is we who free the oppressed, enslaved, or exploited peoples of those planets. The same kind of plot became a staple of the television show Star Trek, broadcast four decades after "When the Green Star Waned" was published. The episode "Operation--Annihilate!", first broadcast in April 1967, is an example. The plot of that episode has similarities to The Puppet Masters by Robert A. Heinlein before it (1951) and the movie Alien afterwards (1979).

There was a contrary development during the Flying Saucer Era of 1947 to 1968 or 1973. During that era, aliens from outer space were often represented as good and caring and benevolent. They were our space brothers, or like angels from on high. Their purpose in coming to Earth was to save us from ourselves. This is what much of the Contactee phenomenon of the 1950s was about. The space brother/space angel/space savior idea was captured pretty well in the movie The Day the Earth Stood Still, released in 1951.

A description of the alien invaders in "When the Green Star Waned" must have sounded familiar to readers of what was then called the pseudo-scientific story (see "Ooze" by Anthony M. Rud in Weird Tales, Mar. 1923), scientifiction (Hugo Gernsback's name for stories of this type), or the scientific romance (a term more commonly used in Great Britain, I think). A passage from "When the Green Star Waned":
     And here we found life, such as it was. I found it, and a wondrous start the ugly thing gave me! It was in semblance but a huge pulpy blob of a loathly blue color, in diameter over twice Hul Jok's height, with a gaping, triangular-shaped orifice for mouth, in which were set scarlet fangs; and that maw was in the center of the bloated body. At each corner of this mouth there glared malignant an oval, opaque, silvery eye.
     Well it was for me that, in obedience to Hul Jok's imperative command, I was holding my Blastor pointing ahead of me; for as I blundered full upon the monstrosity it upheaved its ugly bulk--how, I do not know, for I saw no legs nor did it have wings--to one edge and would have flopped down upon me, but instinctively I slid forward the catch on the tiny Blastor, and the foul thing vanished--save for a few fragments of its edges--smitten into nothingness by the vibrations hurled forth from that powerful little disintegrator.

Here is a similar passage, of the narrator's first encounter with an alien, in The War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells, first published in Pearson's Magazine from April to December 1897:

    A big greyish rounded bulk, the size, perhaps, of a bear, was rising slowly and painfully out of the cylinder. As it bulged up and caught the light, it glistened like wet leather.

    Two large dark-coloured eyes were regarding me steadfastly. The mass that framed them, the head of the thing, was rounded, and had, one might say, a face. There was a mouth under the eyes, the lipless brim of which quivered and panted, and dropped saliva. The whole creature heaved and pulsated convulsively. A lank tentacular appendage gripped the edge of the cylinder, another swayed in the air.

    Those who have never seen a living Martian can scarcely imagine the strange horror of its appearance. The peculiar V-shaped mouth with its pointed upper lip, the absence of brow ridges, the absence of a chin beneath the wedgelike lower lip, the incessant quivering of this mouth, the Gorgon groups of tentacles, the tumultuous breathing of the lungs in a strange atmosphere, the evident heaviness and painfulness of movement due to the greater gravitational energy of the earth--above all, the extraordinary intensity of the immense eyes--were at once vital, intense, inhuman, crippled and monstrous. There was something fungoid in the oily brown skin, something in the clumsy deliberation of the tedious movements unspeakably nasty. Even at this first encounter, this first glimpse, I was overcome with disgust and dread.

Dyalhis' aliens aren't quite the same as Wells', but his description of them is close enough that I sense the influence of the latter upon the former. Wells' prose here found echoes in that of H.P. Lovecraft, too, I think. Maybe there was an influence there as well.

By the way, Nictzin Dayalhis was the originator of the term Blastor, later blaster, a weapon that will forever be indispensable in our fight against alien invasions.

Next: Andrew Brosnatch's Cover.

Note
(1) Light as an indication of life has been in the news as I write, for a spectrographic analysis of the atmosphere of a planet called K2-18b shows signs of what some scientists believe could be life on that planet. (A skepto-graphic analysis might show something different.) The indicating compounds are sulfurous. Sulfur has of course been associated with Hell, the Devil, and a general wickedness or evil. Hold onto that thought for next time.

(2) The silence of the planet Earth in "When the Green Star Waned" makes me think of Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis. In Lewis' version, Earth is "silent" because we are under a kind of cosmic quarantine, the reason being that human beings are "bent," another way of saying, I guess, that we are fallen in our nature. Hold onto the idea of a fallen man for next time as well.

Original text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Monday, April 21, 2025

Gatz, Kurtz, & Ántonia

For my next feat, I will attempt to connect Shakespeare to Conrad to Fitzgerald and Cather to mid-century urban horror to twenty-first-century cosmic horror. Edgar Allan Poe will make an appearance, too . . .

If you look hard enough and think hard enough, if you let your mind wander freely, you can make connections among any number of fictional works. So I'll give it away right away and let you know that this isn't much of a feat after all. This is just a brain, an eye, and a memory at work. I'll start with three novels in English published in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries . . .

Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad (1899), My Ántonia by Willa Cather (1918), and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald (1925) have at least one thing in common, for all three are first-person narratives told by a friend and observer of a great person. Here is Nick Carraway on Jay Gatsby:

If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register earthquakes ten thousand miles away. This responsiveness had nothing to do with that flabby impressionability which is dignified under the name of the "creative temperament"--it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as I have never found in any other person and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No--Gatsby turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and short-winded elations of men. (Chapter 1)

Now Marlow on Kurtz:

"Kurtz discoursed. A voice! a voice! It rang deep to the very last. It survived his strength to hide in the magnificent folds of eloquence the barren darkness of his heart. Oh, he struggled! he struggled! The wastes of his weary brain were haunted by shadowy images now--images of wealth and fame revolving obsequiously round his unextinguishable gift of noble and lofty expression. My Intended, my station, my career, my ideas--these were the subjects for the occasional utterances of elevated sentiments. The shade of the original Kurtz frequented the bedside of the hollow sham, whose fate it was to be buried presently in the mould of primeval earth. But both the diabolic love and the unearthly hate of the mysteries it had penetrated fought for the possession of that soul satiated with primitive emotions, avid of lying fame, of sham distinction, of all the appearances of success and power.

     "Sometimes he was contemptibly childish. He desired to have kings meet him at railway-stations on his return from some ghastly Nowhere, where he intended to accomplish great things." (Chapter III)

And finally Jim Burden on Ántonia:

     I lay awake for a long while, until the slow-moving moon passed my window on its way up the heavens. I was thinking about Ántonia and her children; about Anna's solicitude for her, Ambrosch's grave affection, Leo's jealous, animal little love. That moment, when they all came tumbling out of the cave into the light, was a sight any man might have come far to see. Ántonia had always been one to leave images in the mind that did not fade--that grew stronger with time. In my memory there was a succession of such pictures, fixed there like the old woodcuts of one's first primer: Ántonia kicking her bare legs against the sides of my pony when we came home in triumph with our snake; Ántonia in her black shawl and fur cap, as she stood by her father's grave in the snowstorm; Ántonia coming in with her work-team along the evening sky-line. She lent herself to immemorial human attitudes which we recognize by instinct as universal and true. I had not been mistaken. She was a battered woman now, not a lovely girl; but she still had that something which fires the imagination, could still stop one's breath for a moment by a look or gesture that somehow revealed the meaning in common things. She had only to stand in the orchard, to put her hand on a little crab tree and look up at the apples, to make you feel the goodness of planting and tending and harvesting at last. All the strong things of her heart came out in her body, that had been so tireless in serving generous emotions. (Book V, Chapter II)

     It was no wonder that her sons stood tall and straight. She was a rich mine of life, like the founders of early races.

Whereas Gatsby has "an extraordinary gift for hope," Kurtz would seem a man in despair, or tipping on its edge. Although his is a "gift of noble and lofty expression," his last words are unclear, ambiguous. What does Kurtz mean when he cries, "The horror! The horror!"? Both are men of ambition, though. As a young man, Gatsby embarked upon a program of self-improvement. His ultimate ambition is to capture the heart of a woman. Kurtz's ambitions lie elsewhere. He has his Intended, but he has gone far away from her and never sees her again, dying as he does in Africa. Gatsby is a quintessentially American character, but Kurtz could be as well, at least at a basic level, for he goes away from woman and civilization into the wilderness. As for Ántonia, she is another kind of person altogether, "a rich mine of life, like the founders of early races." Only she among these three characters has children.

Like Marlow, Jay Gatsby--originally James Gatz--served on board a craft, in his case the yacht of a wealthy man. Nick describes Gatsby as "extravagantly ambitious." Nothing deters him in his pursuit of his dream. Gatz's journey--soon Gatsby's--takes him from North Dakota to the Great Lakes, the West Indies, the Barbary Coast, finally to Long Island. Like Kurtz, he dies afloat. Whereas Kurtz departs from this earth on a boat bearing him downriver, like a latter-day pharaoh, Gatsby's life ends in a bitterly ironic way, in a swimming pool, on a pneumatic mattress. The yacht of his youth is in the distant past. His last craft is the size and dimensions of an open grave.

Marlow makes a different kind of journey. He travels from a great city into the dark heart of Africa, there to find and fetch back Kurtz, like Orpheus after Eurydice. He is his own Charon, or maybe his boat is a new Argo and his adventures in Africa a new argosy told to men on board a different craft, years later, upon the still, darkening waters of the mouth of the Thames. His earlier boat churns up and down river as he looks for Kurtz, then carries him away. The yawl Nellie, named for a woman, comes to rest in the very opening sentence of Heart of Darkness, and Marlow begins his tale, told only to men.

In his journey upriver, Marlow looks upon the deep, green, and wild world on its banks. This is a place mostly untouched by Europeans. In his upriver journey, his boat beats against the current. The journey downriver is easier on the boat but harder on Kurtz its passenger. In the end, he has on his face a look of "an intense and hopeless despair."

At the end of The Great Gatsby, Nick broods upon his own experience in knowing Gatsby:

     Most of the big shore places were closed now and there were hardly any lights except the shadowy, moving glow of a ferryboat across the Sound. And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away until gradually I became aware of the old island here that flowered once for Dutch sailors' eyes--a fresh, green breast of the new world. Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby's house, had once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams; for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder.

Marlow has a darker vision, I think, but Nick Carraway's words on the "fresh, green breast of the new world" are something like Marlow's in his encounter with an old and green and dark Africa. The American encounter with the wilderness is hopeful and full of positive awe and wonder. The European encounter--Marlow's and Kurtz's--must be far less so. And then there is the famous closing of The Great Gatsby:

     Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that's no matter--tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther . . . And one fine morning--

      So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

If time is a river without banks, then we can never go ashore and the future is unreachable. The river carries Marlow back to the sea--the point of origin for all of us--and bears Gatsby--all men--into the past. In My Ántonia, there are rivers, riverbanks, and bluffs high above, but these are places for play, or they are part of a great and awesome landscape, or they are rivers to cross: no one in My Ántonia goes lengthwise, up or down a river. And the only sea in Nebraska is a sea of grass. The breath of the prairie wind makes waves across its surface.

In My Ántonia, Jim Burden and Ántonia Shimerda also make their journeys. Jim is from the East, specifically Virginia. Ántonia is from even farther east, from Bohemia. Both arrive in Nebraska--like Jay Gatsby's home state, a place on the Great Plains--as children. Ántonia remains and lives out her life in this place close to the earth. The plants in her landscape are not wild but cultivated, planted and tended, grown and harvested. Her farm is green and is not one of gray ashes. Like Nick Carraway, Jim Burden goes east, to New York City, thus nearly cutting himself off from his past and his friend. The main characters in The Great Gatsby are from the Midwest and the Great Plains, or what was then or before called the Middle Border, as was their creator. Like Jim Burden, Willa Cather was from Virginia but grew up in Nebraska. Like Gatsby, she died in New York, though in the city rather than on the island. Of these three novels, My Ántonia is the most positive and affirmative. In fact, it's one of the most beautiful books I have ever read, one brimming with love and affection. Curiously, the last word in both The Great Gatsby and My Ántonia is "past."

I have written before that someone should look into connections between Edgar Allan Poe and William Shakespeare. I'm not ready just yet to talk about Shakespeare in this essay. Instead I'll make a brief connection between Poe and Conrad. The climactic event in Poe's long short story "The Fall of the House of Usher" (1839) is of course the fall of the House of Usher. Towards the end of Heart of Darkness, Marlow goes to visit with Kurtz's unnamed Intended. He tells her a lie about Kurtz and practically flees from her presence, telling the men who are listening to his tale, "It seemed to me that the house would collapse before I could escape, that the heavens would fall upon my head."

In October 1941, Unknown Worlds published a story by Fritz Leiber, Jr., called "Smoke Ghost." This story is justly famous among fans of fantasy and horror. I don't care much for the ever-finer dividing of genre fiction into evermore minute sub-genres and sub-sub-genres, but I feel okay about calling "Smoke Ghost" an example of urban horror. Here is a passage describing the urban landscape through which the main character, Catesby Wran, moves:

      It had all begun on the elevated. There was a particular little sea of roofs he had grown into the habit of glancing at just as the packed car carrying him homeward lurched around a turn. A dingy, melancholy little world of tar-paper, tarred gravel, and smoky brick. Rusty tin chimneys with odd conical hats suggested abandoned listening posts. There was a washed-out advertisement of some ancient patent medicine on the nearest wall. Superficially it was like ten thousand other drab city roofs. But he always saw it around dusk, either in the smoky half-light, or tinged with red by the flat rays of a dirty sunset, or covered by ghostly wind-blown white sheets of rain-splash, or patched with blackish snow; and it seemed unusually bleak and suggestive, almost beautifully ugly, though in no sense picturesque; dreary, but meaningful. Unconsciously it came to symbolize for Catesby Wran certain disagreeable aspects of the frustrated, frightened century in which he lived, the jangled century of hate and heavy industry and total wars. The quick, daily glance into the half darkness became an integral part of his life. Oddly, he never saw it in the morning, for it was then his habit to sit on the other side of the car, his head buried in the paper.

And now here are the opening paragraphs of Chapter 2 of The Great Gatsby, published sixteen years before:

     About half way between West Egg and New York the motor-road hastily joins the railroad and runs beside it for a quarter of a mile, so as to shrink away from a certain desolate area of land. This is a valley of ashes--a fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat into ridges and hills and grotesque gardens where ashes take the forms of houses and chimneys and rising smoke and finally, with a transcendent effort, of men who move dimly and already crumbling through the powdery air. Occasionally a line of grey cars crawls along an invisible track, gives out a ghastly creak and comes to rest, and immediately the ash-grey men swarm up with leaden spades and stir up an impenetrable cloud which screens their obscure operations from your sight.

     But above the grey land and the spasms of bleak dust which drift endlessly over it, you perceive, after a moment, the eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg. The eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg are blue and gigantic—their retinas are one yard high. They look out of no face but, instead, from a pair of enormous yellow spectacles which pass over a nonexistent nose. Evidently some wild wag of an oculist set them there to fatten his practice in the borough of Queens, and then sank down himself into eternal blindness or forgot them and moved away. But his eyes, dimmed a little by many paintless days under sun and rain, brood on over the solemn dumping ground. 

Note the descriptions of advertisements in both. This is the America of the twentieth century.

(Is Catesby an intentional echo or eye rhyme of Gatsby?)

My second-to-last connection is between Shakespeare and Conrad. This is actually not a connection I have made. I'm just following the lead of Richard Meek of the University of Hull, who, on a website called Borrowers & Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation, wrote an essay called "'Nothing like the image and horror of it': King Lear and Heart of Darkness." You can read his essay by clicking here. I don't know Shakespeare well enough to have recognized the influence of King Lear upon Heart of Darkness when I read Conrad's novel, but even I can see that when somebody writes several nevers in a row, he's probably echoing Shakespeare, and that very thing happens when Marlow goes to meet with Kurtz's Intended, who says: "'I cannot believe that I shall never see him again, that nobody will see him again, never, never, never.'"

I wrote about Conrad and Heart of Darkness recently because I was looking into a possible connection between the author, his novel, and the cosmic horror of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. I didn't find anything conclusive. I don't think Kurtz's final cry is about horror in a cosmic sense. I think his thoughts are elsewhere. But if Heart of Darkness was influenced by King Lear, then there is this:

"King Lear -- '. . . Shakespeare staring cosmic horror in the face and refusing to back off,'" a quote from Matt Wolf, "London-Based Theater Critic," in an advertisement for a performance of King Lear, from the Muskegon (Michigan) Chronicle, May 16, 1999, whole page number 77.

A final note: The Great Gatsby is now one hundred years old. More than a few people have written on the book and its anniversary. I have read two otherwise good online essays on it, but both mention our current president, and I wonder why. Is that really necessary? Better yet, will it age well? The answers, I think, are no and most definitely not. Anyway, I hope this essay gives everyone enough to read for a while. It might be some time before I write again.

Original text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Friday, April 18, 2025

Crosses on the Cover of Weird Tales

Today is Good Friday, representing the day on which Jesus Christ died upon the Cross. Weird Tales was of course a popular and secular magazine, although I would guess that most of its writers were either Christians or Jews, or nominally so.* I'm sure there were some atheists in there, too. Even so, "The Unique Magazine" published stories that have a religious background, or they contain references to religion and faith, or some of their characters are believers in God. Six years ago, I wrote about Easter stories, of which there were at least three in Weird Tales. You can read what I wrote by clicking here. If anyone finds more Easter stories, I would be happy to hear about them.

I have found crosses on six covers of Weird Tales. Most of these are incidental to the picture. Three are of crosses as headstones or parts of headstones. The first illustration below, created by Hugh Rankin, shows men who look like Crusaders, but the crosses on their surcoats appear to be upside down. And they are looking to a cross upon which a bat is hung. So even though this looks like it could be a Christian scene, it's not. It's actually an inversion and corruption of Christianity. Reading the story confirms as much. The third picture below, by C.C. Senf, is a picture of torture or punishment. It sure looks like the red-robed cultists are affixing a woman to a cross.

Regarding the second picture below, illustrating "A  Million Years After" by Katherine Metcalf Roof, I am reminded of something I noticed several years ago in the comics page. It used to be that in the comic strip Beetle Bailey, drawn by the late, great Mort Walker, any long view of Camp Swampy would show the camp church or chapel with a cross on top. That's what churches are like. But then, after Mr. Walker died, an editor must have gotten ahold of the strip--an editor who must think of crosses as being exclusive or offensive, I guess--because the cross disappeared. There was and still is a chaplain, Chaplain Stainglass, but he appears to be a preacher without portfolio, for the Cross is the symbol of his Christian faith and now it's gone from his chapel. What a ridiculous and insulting thing for the people behind Beetle Bailey to do. How stupid and petty. But we should remember that there have always been and always will be anti-Christian people, ideas, and actions--until there aren't anymore. Anyway, Happy Easter to Everyone, even if you don't believe in anything.

-----

*One of those writers was a Christian minister, Reverend Henry S. Whitehead (1882-1932).

Weird Tales, December 1928, with cover art by Hugh Rankin. Cover story: "The Chapel of Mystic Horror," a Jules de Grandin story by Seabury Quinn.

Weird Tales, November 1930, with cover art by C.C. Senf. Cover story: "A Million Years After" by Katherine Metcalf Roof.
Weird Tales, February 1932, with cover art by J. Allen St. John. Cover story: "The Devil's Bride" by Seabury Quinn.

Weird Tales, April 1939, with cover art by Virgil Finlay. Cover story: "Susette" by Seabury Quinn.

Weird Tales, May 1946, with cover art by Ronald Clyne. Cover story: "The Valley of the Gods" by Edmond Hamilton.

Weird Tales, January 1952, with cover art by Jon Arfstrom. I talked to Jon Arfstrom at PulpFest, in Columbus, Ohio, in the last year of his life. He said that this was a portfolio piece that he submitted to Weird Tales. The editor decided to run it as a cover, but the proportions were off, and so a green shape was added to the top of Mr. Arfstrom's illustration and the main title logo placed over the top of it. The cover text reads "The Black Island" by August Derleth, but I can't say that Derleth's is the cover story.

Text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Thursday, April 17, 2025

The Four Big L's

To us, the Weird Tales of 1923 to 1954 is a completed body of work. It's all one piece and will forever be unchanging and unchangeable. But to readers in its time, especially in its early years, the magazine was still opening up for them, still alive and growing. It must have been like a journey made in a new land. No one knew what vistas and what new marvels would appear around each bend in the road. It was exciting to them. You can tell it by the letters they wrote to "The Eyrie." I wish we still had all of those letters, including those that were never published. Alas, every day, week, month, and year, another library at Alexandria must be burned.

Early on there must have been authors who showed real promise. For example, Canadian author Julian Kilman (1878-1954) had five stories in the first year of Weird Tales. Readers never heard from him again. They loved "Invaders from Outside" by J. Schlossel (Joseph H. Schlossel [1902-1977]), published in the January issue of 1925. But Schlossel had just two more stories in Weird Tales, in 1925 and 1926.

On the other hand, readers saw right away the promise in H. P. Lovecraft (1890-1937), and they clamored for more. Lovecraft's name is almost synonymous with Weird Tales. We think of him as one of the Big Three of the magazine, a trio that also included Robert E. Howard (1906-1936) and Clark Ashton Smith (1893-1961). Even by April 1925, though, Lovecraft was recognized as a big name. In "The Eyrie" that month, the anonymous editor--Farnsworth Wright--let readers know what was in store for the following issue or issues, writing, "In addition to Burks, Owen and Quinn, you will have stories by the four big L's--La Spina, Leahy, Long and Lovecraft."

"The Four Big L's"--if that were a more euphonious appellation, it could have been the name of a rock 'n' roll band from the early 1960s.

Before writing about the Four Big L's, I should mention the other three:

  • Burks was Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974), then in the U.S. Marine Corps but writing fiction about places he had been to, including tales of Santo Domingo.
  • Owen was Frank Owen (1893-1968), who would prove a very prolific author and editor. He had a very popular story, "The Wind That Tramps the World," in the April issue of 1925.
  • Quinn was of course Seabury Quinn (1889-1969), who went on to write more stories and other works for Weird Tales than anyone else.
Now the Four Big L's:
  • La Spina was Greye La Spina (1880-1969), a very popular author and one of few who would have stories in Weird Tales during every decade of its original run, from the 1920s to the 1950s.
  • Leahy was John Martin Leahy (1886-1967), also a very popular author but who disappeared from Weird Tales after 1928. I have never read his stories. They sound promising. I would like to think that his membership in the Four Big L's was well deserved.
  • Long was Frank Belknap Long (1901-1994), a young author who, in 1925, had recently had a brush with death but who would go on to live longer than all of the others. He was a member of Lovecraft's circle.
  • And of course Lovecraft was H.P. Lovecraft (1890-1937), who stood above most writers in Weird Tales for his erudition, imagination, and tireless reading, writing, editing, helping, guiding, advising, thinking, and theorizing, also for his formation of a coherent and consistent worldview and, above that, cosmic-view.
So for a time, there were the Four Big L's, and what a time it must have been for readers of Weird Tales. And now I wonder whether there were other editorial groupings of big names. We'll have to keep our eye out for mention of them in "The Eyrie."

Original text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Weird Tales, April 1925

One hundred years ago this month, the enigmatic Nictzin Dyalhis made his debut in the pages of Weird Tales magazine. His story, "When the Green Star Waned," was both the cover story and the lead story. The cover art was by Andrew Brosnatch.

"When the Green Star Waned" is an unusual story. Set in the far future, it tells of men of Venus--or Venhez--who save the men of Earth--or Aerth by their spelling of it--from slavery and oppression at the hands--or tentacles--of alien invaders. This isn't really science fiction but science fantasy, or maybe it should be called weird science. It wasn't the first story of its type: in January 1925, Weird Tales published J. Schlossel's science fantasy or outer space fantasy "Invaders from Outside." But "When the Green Star Waned" struck a nerve in readers. It became the most popular story of 1925 in Weird Tales and the fifth most popular of the period November 1924 to January 1940, with 63 votes in total. As an example of the readers' positive responses, James Godfrey Osgood, Jr., of Fitchburg, Massachusetts, wrote: 

I do not think you have overstated the case one bit when you say that When the Green Star Waned, by Nictzin Dyalhis, is one of the most remarkable stories of its kind which have yet appeared. Indeed, of its peculiar genre it is the best, I have no doubt, and, needless to say, is my choice for the best story in the April number. (From "The Eyrie," June 1925)

Other authors who had their first stories for Weird Tales in the April issue were: Joel Martin Nichols, Jr., James W. Bennett, Donald E. Keyhoe, H. Thompson Rich, Robert E. Ulmer, and Walter G. Detrick. Several other authors had their one and only story in that same issue.

* * *

There are two items from "The Eyrie" that I would like to point out. First is a long quote in the form of a screen shot of the scanned page. I hope you can read it.


For emphasis: "WEIRD TALES plays no favorites." But that was 1925. Things were different ninety-eight years later when the Cosmic Horror Issue, Number 367, was published, for the authors in that issue are friends of the editor. I'll just say, publishing a magazine is not like an Andy Hardy movie. You don't get your friends together to put on a show. It's something more serious than that, and you owe your readers--and the 100-year reputation of your magazine--more than what amounts to just an APAzine.

* * *

The second item was a preview of the May 1925 issue of Weird Tales. The editor wrote: "In addition to Burks, Owen and Quinn, you will have stories by the four big L's--La Spina, Leahy, Long and Lovecraft." We have all heard of the big three in Weird Tales--H.P. Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, and Clark Ashton Smith. This is the first I have heard of the four big L's.

To be continued . . .

Original text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Sunday, April 13, 2025

The Great Gatsby

I have been writing about the Weird Tales of one hundred years ago. In February, I wrote about The New Yorker at one hundred and its pretty tenuous connections to "The Unique Magazine." The Daily Cartoonist noticed. D.D. Degg wrote an article called "Reports: The New Yorker at 100" for that website and closed his or her article with mention of my own. You can find "Reports: The New Yorker at 100" by clicking here. I did not find until today an article in The New Yorker about H.P. Lovecraft and Robert Barlow. That one is called "The Complicated Friendship of H. P. Lovecraft and Robert Barlow, One of His Biggest Fans." The author is Paul La Farge, and his article was published in The New Yorker on March 9, 2017.

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald was also published one hundred years ago. The date was April 10, 1925, and so the anniversary came last week. Although it arrived on the scene a century ago, The Great Gatsby is closer to us than it was to anything published one hundred years before it. Fitzgerald's short novel is still very modern. It could almost take place today. There are obsessions with money and status. Advertising, in the form of a billboard, figures pretty prominently. There is also a lot of driving in The Great Gatsby, and in fact the plot turns upon an automobile accident. There is also of course violence. This is after all an American novel and a novel of America. Near the end, the body of a murdered Gatsby is found in a swimming pool, like that of William Holden's character in Sunset Boulevard (1950).

I don't think of F. Scott Fitzgerald at all as an author of genre works, but there is an entry on him in The Internet Speculative Fiction Database. In 1991, Robert Hale, a British firm, published The Fantasy and Mystery Stories of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Its contents:

  • Introduction by Peter Haining
  • "Tarquin of Cheapside" (1921)
  • "His Russet Witch" (originally "O Russet Witch!" 1922)
  • "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" (1922)
  • "The Dance" (1926)
  • "A Short Trip Home" (1927)
  • "Outside the Cabinet-Maker's" (originally "Outside the Cabinet-Makers" 1928)
  • "The Fiend" (1935)

Early on, The Great Gatsby did not sell well. Its readership increased greatly after October 1945 when it was published as an Armed Services Editions. And now H.P. Lovecraft comes up again, for the publishers of Armed Services Editions also issued The Dunwich Horror and Other Weird Tales in June 1945. That was the first of the series with the word weird in the title. The second was The Great God Pan and Other Weird Stories by Arthur Machen, from December 1945. Other tellers of weird tales who were published include Edgar Allan Poe, Lord Dunsany, H.G. Wells, Edison Marshall, Robert W. Chambers, and Wilbur Daniel SteeleBy the way, The Great Gatsby was adapted to television in 1955 as an episode of Robert Montgomery Presents, with Robert Montgomery, Phyllis Kirk, and Lee Bowman. That episode was directed by Alvin Sapinsley, who also directed the first television adaptation of a story by H.P. Lovecraft, "Pickman's Model," broadcast on December 1, 1971, as an episode of Rod Serling's Night Gallery.

Fitzgerald is supposed to have been influenced by Joseph Conrad and Willa Cather in the writing of his novel. There are similarities between The Great Gatsby and My Ántonia (1918), specifically in the first-person narration of a friend of the title character in observation and praise of him or her. My Ántonia is set in the American West, a place far from Europe and depicted as clean and pure. It is also a positive and loving story. The Great Gatsby, of course, is set in the East, a place about as close as you can get to Europe and still be in the United States. That place is shown as being corrupt and even decadent, and the story itself is tragic. But this is an American kind of corruption, I think, based as it is on money, status, and self-improvement. Curiously, the main characters in The Great Gatsby are from the Midwest and the Plains, Gatsby himself from North Dakota, just two states (or one and half) away from the Nebraska of My Ántonia. They remind me of the characters in Seinfeld. (It's fitting that that series ended with all of them sitting in a jail cell.) Gatsby more than any of them is perhaps admirable. As for further similarities between The Great Gatsby and My Ántonia, you can decide for yourself whether one or both have homoerotic undertones. 

Jay Gatsby is like a weird-fictional character in that he oversteps his bounds and pays the price for doing so. Some of those bounds are of himself. Others are of the society, culture, and nation in which he lives. Gatsby may be called great, but he isn't a hero. Maybe after the Great War (which also wasn't great) and all of its devastations, there were no more heroes--or at least very few--in mainstream fiction. I would have to think on that for a while. But there were still heroes in genre fiction, in Westerns, crime and detective stories, and soon-to-be science fiction. I feel certain that that was one of the attractions in reading genre fiction. I will write shortly on heroism, courage, and their opposites. Some of that will also involve cars and driving, which, like violence, seem to go with our America.

Happy Anniversary to The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald!

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald (1925), the original dust jacket illustration, executed in gouache, by Spanish artist Francis Cugat (1896-1981). This could easily be a cover of The New Yorker. It could almost work as a cover of Weird Tales, with the nudes in Daisy's eyes drawn by Margaret Brundage.

Text copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

The Ships of Literature

When I wrote last, I pretty clearly placed literature above the level of genre fiction. That might be a little harsh. It's likely to offend fans of weird fiction, science fiction, horror, and so on. It might sound a little snobbish, too. People read for lots of different reasons. Every one is a good one, I think, unless you're reading a book on how to murder your spouse. Fans of genre fiction read for entertainment and escape, but the same can be said of those who read more nearly literary works. We read to escape from our own lives and to learn about the lives of others, to encounter them in the times and places in which they have lived. In that way, every book is a fantasy, and all reading an adventure. How many bookplates and library posters have you seen in which a book is compared to a sailing ship? That ship takes us away from our own lives and homes and countries, even to the other side of the world. Although there are literary novels of adventure, we think of adventure as a type of genre fiction. So maybe every good book is a type of fantasy, a story of adventure, something that takes us away and allows us to escape from our own lives, if only for a while. Remember that the first pulp magazine, a magazine of all fiction, was called The Argosy and was named after a ship of adventure.

None of that takes away from the fact that genre fiction, especially weird fiction, horror, science fiction, and even detective stories, are very often done in poor taste. Fiction of this type can be extremely and gratuitously violent, bloody, and gory. Too many readers seem to like it that way. They seem to seek out and actually enjoy bloody horrors. There is also a lot of salacious writing in these genres. Readers seem to seek out that kind of thing, too. And beyond that, there is the simple crime of just plain bad writing. Fans and scholars of genre fiction want their subject matter to be elevated to the level of literature and art, but you can't have it both ways. It can't be good if it's bad. It can't be considered at a high level if it exists at a low one. People love H.P. Lovecraft. His writing has received a fair amount of scholarly attention. Even Leslie Fiedler mentioned Lovecraft in his book Love and Death in the American Novel (1960). But none of that changes the fact that Lovecraft was guilty of some pretty bad writing. And he's at the top of the heap. What must be below him? Anyway, if you're going to defend genre fiction as being good or in good taste, you might be forced into the same situation as William Gaines, who said before Congress that a comic book cover showing a man holding a woman's severed head was in fact in good taste.

Speaking of Lovecraft, a few years ago, I read a book called Lovecraft Country by Matt Ruff (2016). I meant to write about it at the time. I still might. There are lots of literary and other kinds of offenses in Mr. Ruff's novel. I won't go into that right now. I'll just say that within ten minutes of finishing it, I began reading Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood (2003), and I found more good writing on the first page or two of Ms. Atwood's novel than in all of Lovecraft Country. Although Margaret Atwood derides science fiction as "talking squids in outer space" (she's looking at you, Admiral Ackbar!), Oryx and Crake is science fictional, for it is both dystopian and post-apocalyptic. But as a literary work, it exists at a higher level than things like Lovecraft Country. And I'm afraid that an excerpt from Lovecraft Country would fit right in with the current Weird Tales. Anything Margaret Atwood writes might not, as she understands (I think) that only a woman can be a woman. That's not a popular opinion in popular fiction or our current popular culture.

This is not to say that what is called literature is necessarily good, or better, or more enjoyable, or written at a higher level than is genre fiction. It's also not to say that what is called literature cannot be bloody, violent, salacious, and so on. Not long ago, I read a novel called Tremor of Intent by Anthony Burgess (1966). On its surface, Tremor of Intent is a spy novel, or a type of genre fiction, but I think Burgess had a more serious intent in writing it. (The American first edition was subtitled "An Eschatological Spy Novel.") Tremor of Intent is literary: I think Anthony Burgess was a good writer with a high purpose. Nonetheless, it has one of the most gruesome scenes I have ever read in a novel of any kind, so gruesome as to be fascinating in its gruesomeness. The point is that just because a work is considered literary doesn't mean that it does not also have things in common with genre fiction. The opposite can be true, too.

Anthony Burgess was a near contemporary of John Osborne, who wrote, among other things, Look Back in Anger (1956). Osborne was one of the "angry young men" of the 1950s. I read his play a long time ago. I found his protagonist Jimmy to be cruel, unpleasant, unlikable, unsympathetic. Look Back in Anger is considered a realist play. It followed in a line going back to the nineteenth century, including the naturalism of the nineteenth century. Naturalism and realism are considered literary. I guess we're supposed to find value in works of this type. Realism caught on well in America. One example that has leapt into my mind is The Man with the Golden Arm by Nelson Algren (1949), another novel that I found to be pretty unpleasant. And just a couple of weeks ago, I read an anthology called Nelson Algren's Own Book of Lonesome Monsters: 13 Masterpieces of Black Humor (1962), and I can tell you this is one of the worst books I have ever read. I should have read a science fiction novel instead of this book of "literature."

Unfortunately, themes, styles, and subject matter have gone back and forth between literature and genre fiction. And unfortunately, genre fiction seems to have become too heavily influenced by what is called literature. I think this is chiefly through naturalism, realism, and I guess post-modernism. The sympathies of authors who work in genre fiction seem to have gone over to the outcast, the aberrant, the perverted, the hateful, the murderous, the nihilistic, and so on. Those same authors seem to want to invite us into the horrible places inside themselves and their own psyches, there to join them in all of their decadence, corruption, hatred, and descent. People don't read in order to hate or to be corrupted or dragged down into darknesses, voids, and abysses, or at least they shouldn't. If they do, there is something really seriously wrong with them. They need spiritual help. (It's there.) When we board a craft, we want it to be a great sailing ship (the leaves of a book are like the sails of a ship), not Charon's ferryboat. Or if we go that way, we want an Orpheus to lead us back.

Copyright 2025 Terence E. Hanley