Sunday, June 12, 2022

The Rise of Chaos

I recently read a political opinion piece that makes reference to not one but two tellers of weird tales. It's called "The Woke Have Confused Sword and Sorcery" and it's by Richard Fernandez, a very interesting thinker and writer. Mr. Fernandez begins his essay with a paraphrasing of Robert E. Howard's famous introduction to his Conan series: "Know, O prince, that between the years . . . ", except that in Mr. Fernandez's version, the chronicle is of events that have taken place between the fall of the USSR and our current "rise of Chaos."

The future--now--was supposed to be science-fictional, not weird-fictional. Yet science has given way to superstition and we live at the beginning of a new dark age. Men now use science-fictional or quasi-science-fictional means to pursue their ends, yet superstition reigns. Socialism is one of these superstitions, of course, but in our age socialism has been eclipsed by Wokism. Wokism is a heresy against reality, but we don't yet know how long it will take to run its course, nor how many will have to suffer and die, nor how far our civilization will have to fall before it does. But reality will out. It always does, despite all of our striving against it.

Richard Fernandez writes:

This [the inevitable failure of Woke plans and ideas] is perhaps the reason why our politicians, the modern sorcerers with all the clanking machinery of the End of History at their disposal, are surprised when their confident plans to boost the economy, flatten the pandemic curve and replace nuclear plants with windmills unaccountably take off in unknown directions. The usual explanation is it's not that Woke sorcery has stopped working; it's bad luck.

And then he quotes Robert A. Heinlein:

     Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded--here and there, now and then--are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

     This is known as "bad luck."

(The quote is from "Notebooks of Lazarus Long" in Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact, June 1973, page 77, originally in Time Enough for Love, also published in 1973. Happy June to everyone!)

Richard Fernandez writes for a website that is sometimes behind a paywall, even if all you have to pay is your consent to allow advertisements. That's a shame. His writing deserves wider reading. But if you would like to give it a try, look for "The Woke Have Confused Sword and Sorcery" by way of a link on Mr. Fernandez's website, Wretchard.com. His essay is dated May 30, 2022. Since then, he has written about zombies, as we all seemingly must do.

Original text copyright 2022 Terence E. Hanley

8 comments:

  1. Well put, Terence. The evolution of Man (is it still okay to use this term?) looks like it's about to mutate into something out of a science-fiction story. After that apocalypse, then we'll end up living in a New Hyborian Age. My sword and whetstone are ready. . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, John,

      I'm always glad to hear from you.

      TH

      Delete
  2. I just found this website and I like it!

    John, I'm with your way of thinking. When the antifa woke brigade showed up on our street in late 2020 I got out my rusty old machete, cleaned it up and sharpened it on my grinder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Anonymous,

      Welcome to Tellers of Weird Tales. I'm glad you like it.

      TH

      Delete
  3. Does anyone say "woke" except for out of touch dorks?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Anonymous,

      I'm not sure what you mean in your comment. Can you clarify?

      I did an online search for academic papers about Wokeness. Here are three results:

      "We Are Woke: A Collaborative Critical Autoethnography of Three 'Womxn' of Color Graduate Students in Higher Education" by Aeriel A. Ashlee, Bianca Zamora, and Shamika N. Karikari, in The International Journal of Multicultural Education (2017).

      "Woke Pedagogy: A Framework for Teaching and Learning" by Altheria Caldera in Diversity, Social Justice, and the Educational Leader (2018).

      "Woke-washing: 'intersectional' femvertising and branding 'woke' bravery" by Francesca Sobande in European Journal of Marketing (2019).

      So, if "out of touch dorks" are the only people who say "woke" then are the authors of these papers "out of touch dorks"? Was "woke" at one time a legitimate term and has since been ruined by "out of touch dorks"? If so, when did that happen? Was it before or after these papers and papers like them were published? Who are "the out of touch dorks" who use the term "woke"? Can you provide examples?

      Thanks for writing.

      TH

      Delete
  4. hello, TH! I think the three entries in your quasi-bibliography there, when read in the chronlogical order you've provided, tell a nice little history of how terms move from specific communities to the culture at large--your Fernandez citation might be added, as representing the final step in this dilution of meaning: a once quite specific term has been reduced to standing for "anything about contemporary society that the author doesn't like"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Anonymous,

      Thanks for writing.

      Unfortunately we now live in a society in which people wish to silence others who disagree with them, or they call other people names. Telling people to shut up and calling them names are of course childish behaviors, but then we have become an extremely childish people. And there doesn't seem to be anything in sight that will force us to grow up.

      TH

      Delete